Recent development regarding same-sex marriage

範疇(F) 同運動態 1.ii. 同性婚姻(案例).外國
編號F1ii0014
作者Various Author
題目Recent development regarding same-sex marriage
日期20130626-27
簡介Include articles about the US Supreme Court in historic rulings on gay marriage; Countries which allow gay marriage; Q&A: Same‐sex marriage in the US; The gay people against gay marriage; Same‐sex marriage: French parliament approves new law; Gay marriage around the world; New Zealand legalises same-sex marriage; And Gay marriage: Party leaders hail vote.
關鍵詞U.S., France, New Zealand, Same-sex Marriage, Law
來源NIL
連結NIL

Chapin and Charpentier v. France

範疇(F) 同運動態 1.ii. 同性婚姻(案例).外國
編號F1ii0003
作者Grégor Puppinck
題目Chapin and Charpentier v. France
日期2017
簡介The European Court of Human Rights unanimously recalled that the European Convention on Human Rights does not include the right to marriage for homosexual couples, neither under the right to respect for private and family life (art. 8) nor the right to marry and to found a family (art. 12).
關鍵詞Same sex marriage, Marriage rights, European Union, France
來源European Centre For Law & Justice
連結https://eclj.org/marriage/the-echr-unanimously-confirms-the-non-existence-of-a-right-to-gay-marriage

European Court of Human Rights: Same-sex ‘marriage’ is not a human right

範疇(F) 同運動態 1.ii. 同性婚姻(案例).外國
編號F1ii0002
作者Jan Bentz
題目European Court of Human Rights: Same-sex ‘marriage’ is not a human right
日期20160629
簡介The European Court for Human Rights ruled that homosexual unions are not considered the same as marriage between a man and a woman.
關鍵詞Same sex marriage, Equal marriage rights, Adoption rights, European Union, France
來源The European Court for Human Rights
連結https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-human-rights-court-rejects-gay-marriage

Judgments and decisions of 9 June 2016

範疇(F) 同運動態  1.ii. 同性婚姻(案例).外國
編號F1ii0001
作者European Court of Human Rights
題目Judgments and decisions of 9 June 2016
日期09062016
簡介Chapin and Charpentier v. France (no. 40183/07)* Relying on Article 12 (right to marry) taken together with Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), Mr Chapin and Mr Charpentier submitted that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples amounted to a discriminatory infringement of the right to marry. Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) taken together with Article 14, they contended that they had been discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation.
關鍵詞Same-sex marriage, Discrimination, Court case, France
來源Press Release issued by the Registrar of the Court
連結file:///C:/Users/USER/AppData/Local/Temp/Judgments and decisions of 09.06.16.pdf